Yes, exactly - while humans are "only" highly unlikely to do so. Wasn't that the premise? There's X% probability to get unaccountable bad advice from a human;

Yes, exactly - while humans are "only" highly unlikely to do so. Wasn't that the premise? There's X% probability to get unaccountable bad advice from a human; Y% probability of same from LLM. But the stakes are different not because X!=Y. In fact, those probabilities might as well be equal. It's not like one can do much more than vaguely intuit them. The stakes are different because the LLM is not considered a person, and therefore, one risks less by asking it a question. (Ostensibly, anyway.) >Other humans are available. Sure. Available to miss my point entirely. And then to be upset by my attempts to point it out more precisely. And then downhill from there.