6 ms·

Red Hat OpenShift (IBM) is what a lot of banks have settled on. Red Hat went all in maybe 5+ years ago in capturing those institutions.

• Bigpet 7mo ago
  Is that in addition to mainframes or for completely replacing them?
  • zhengyi13 7mo ago
    Probably both, to respond to the risk tolerances of any given org.
  • esseph 7mo ago
    Both Some stayed at on prem, some pushed code to mainframe VMs in the cloud, some went to OpenShift (mostly on prem from what Ive seen, probably 80-85%).
• VorpalWay 7mo ago
  Ah, that explains why IBM bought RedHat. Or at least one reason for doing so.
  • esseph 7mo ago
    I'd imagine close to 95% in the US, if they're running important workloads on prem on Linux, it's on RHEL. A staggering number of VMs and bare metal.
    • esseph 7mo ago
      (Clarification: I'm not saying 95% of all US company Linux workloads are RHEL, not even close. I'm saying a huge percentage of high criticality (risk of loss of life / high financial risk) are, simply because of support and the name.)
      • nineteen999 7mo ago
        Exactly. The exact opposite of the people flogging internet widgets running on a bunch of AWS instances running Arch/Ubuntu/Cheap distro of the week. Unfortunately that contingent is massively over-represented here on HN.
  • deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]