> Useful for the war in Ukraine, not so useful in Iran Wikipedia isn't a source, but regardless Wikipedia confirms the utility of Starlink in the war. > Are y

> Useful for the war in Ukraine, not so useful in Iran Wikipedia isn't a source, but regardless Wikipedia confirms the utility of Starlink in the war. > Are you referring to DOGE Yes. > without saving any money Your source at Cato Institute confirm 150B. > USAID have been estimated to have caused many tens of thousands of deaths Lancet is a political advocacy magazine. USAID isn' an AID agency. Not funding gay and lesbian theatre in Serbia doesn't stop anyone from dying. > much of the (alleged) money that was saved You said zero money was saved earlier. What is it? > is now going towards the Iran war? It seems like a better investment than giving Iran 1.6 billion dollars to fund terrorism across the middle east, wouldn't you say?