3 ms·
>destroying much of Iran's military and leadership was done from US carriers. If anything it demonstrates how powerful they are. When you have a hammer that co
by asdff 7mo ago
>destroying much of Iran's military and leadership was done from US carriers. If anything it demonstrates how powerful they are.
When you have a hammer that costs billions of dollars in budget you tend to find excuses to use it lest you lose that budget. Imagine if their were no carriers. US airpower just takes off from gulf state airbases and same thing happens to iran.
Unless the US is fighting an air battle in the middle of the ocean, they can probably get by without carriers.
- dinkumthinkum 7mo agoDid you go to War College to learn this? I mean seriously, do you really think they would spend billions of dollars and millions of man hours training …. I mean, I’d it’s possible that maybe you just don’t understand the dynamics of war fighting and there is a reason for carriers to exist besides “fighting in the ocean?”
- asdff 7mo agoWhat are they for beyond a platform for landing planes?
- dinkumthinkum 7mo agoIt's so much more than that. You're asking something that is equivalent to "isn't a cpu just for doing binary stuff?" I would just look more into it. I think even the LLMs that everyone is so fond of will give you more information than that.