4 ms·
Personally I would probably always reach for a docker container if I want a sandboxed command that can run identically anywhere. I appreciate that alternate sa
by eluded7 6mo ago
Personally I would probably always reach for a docker container if I want a sandboxed command that can run identically anywhere.
I appreciate that alternate sandboxing tools can reduce some of the heavier parts of docker though (i.e. building or downloading the correct image)
How would you compare this tool to say bubblewrap https://github.com/containers/ https://github.com/containers/
- ebb_earl_co 6mo agoThe text says that it uses OS-level tools, specifically bubble wrap on Linux.
- afshinmeh 6mo agoThat's right. It uses the same kernel mechanisms as Docker, the runtime is different though (bwrap on linux, seatbelt on mac, etc.)
- hrmtst93837 6mo ago[flagged]
- sebmellen 6mo agoYou are a bot. Botting HN is not allowed. Leave.
- hrmtst93837 6mo ago[flagged]