3 ms·
>TLDR: Greg Kroah-Hartman says that last month something magical happened and AI output is no longer "slop". Opus 4.6 has been a step change. It's simply never
by ramesh31 6mo ago
>TLDR: Greg Kroah-Hartman says that last month something magical happened and AI output is no longer "slop".
Opus 4.6 has been a step change. It's simply never wrong anymore. You may need to continue giving it further clarification as to what you want, but it never makes mistakes with what it intends to do now.
- binarymax 6mo agoIt’s wrong. It made large mistakes on my code literally yesterday.
- brcmthrowaway 6mo agoWrong context
- binarymax 6mo agoNo. Aside from just making an algorithm that didn’t even run, it refused to use an MCP that it had registered in the same context session.
- 9864247888754 6mo ago[dead]
- banannaise 6mo agoAh, the eternal handwave for anything the AI doesn't do well - it must be user error.
- Balinares 6mo agoYo, just because you can't tell when Claude is wrong, doesn't mean it's right. I do agree that the Q1 2026 models in general have passed a threshold, but goodness almighty Opus 4.6 still screws up a lot.
- no_shadowban_6 6mo ago[flagged]
- taormina 6mo agoCan I get your magical version of Opus that works? 4.6 has been a side grade at best, and worse than prior models most days.