3 ms·
I don’t think it could be the most important skill to have. The most common, and the most standardized one for sure, but if coding agents are doing fundamental
by mxkopy 6mo ago
I don’t think it could be the most important skill to have. The most common, and the most standardized one for sure, but if coding agents are doing fundamental R&D or running ops then nobody needs skills anyway.
> As it turns out, neural nets “won”
> The people who scoffed at neural nets and never got up to speed not so much.
I get the feeling you don’t know what you’re talking about. LLMs are impressive but what have they “won” exactly? They require millions of dollars of infrastructure to run coming around a decade after their debut, and we’re really having trouble using them for anything all that serious. Now I’m sure in a few decades’ time this comment will read like a silly cynic but I bet that will only be after those old school machine learning losers come back around and start making improvements again.
- hexaga 6mo agoNeural nets are used in way more applications than just LLMs. They did win. They won decisively in industry, for all kinds of tasks. Equating the use of one with the other is a pretty strong signal of: > you don’t know what you’re talking about Consider: Why did Google have a bazillion TPUs, anyway?
- mxkopy 6mo agoThey are saying coding agents are winning similarly to NNs and that’s what I’m pushing back on