2 ms·
I don't disagree that organizations are probably making that tradeoff in an uninformed way. As a counterpoint -- it's rare I've seen a new UX issue fixed with
by jwilliams 6mo ago
I don't disagree that organizations are probably making that tradeoff in an uninformed way.
As a counterpoint -- it's rare I've seen a new UX issue fixed with a PR.
If you valued quality you could feature-flag some different improvements, get feedback and refine. AI is great at this. We have CS directly submitting Pull Requests now... and they're not junk, 95% of the the time they want things fixed/correct. And it's stuff that usually would sit on the backlog forever. The quality has gone up.
Your experience is representative I'm sure - but I do think there is a way to get this right and those that do will see a big upside.
> Were in for the golden age of cyberattacks, let me tell you.
Agree in full there.
- techblueberry 6mo agoI mean, we weren’t universally careful when we wrote all the code either :-). I’m just salty from a bad day dealing with really bad software. But I do think there’s something inherent in the nature of reducing friction that can make it hard to add some back.