3 ms·
> I think it’s pretty cynical to assume that this is “good enough for most people” It's a deduction, not an assumption. Obviously it's "good enough" for "most
by selcuka 7mo ago
> I think it’s pretty cynical to assume that this is “good enough for most people”
It's a deduction, not an assumption. Obviously it's "good enough" for "most people". Otherwise nobody would be using the free version of ChatGPT today.
I pay for a Claude subscription, but even then I sometimes downgrade to Sonnet or even Haiku when I need a quick answer.
- lxgr 7mo ago> Obviously it's "good enough" for "most people". Otherwise nobody would be using the free version of ChatGPT today. I'd say it's better than nothing, which to me is not the same thing at all as "good enough". For example, I believe most people would be better off with half the allowable queries per day, routed to a better model, but that's not an available product.