4 ms·
That's dual use infrastructure. Its also used for military and goverment purposes, right? The same as China providing weapons components to Russia, masking them
by free652 6mo ago
That's dual use infrastructure. Its also used for military and goverment purposes, right? The same as China providing weapons components to Russia, masking them as "civilian".
- kergonath 6mo ago"The Russians did it as well" is not a fantastic excuse for a war crime… You might want to think this through a bit more.
- shiroiuma 6mo agoWhat's the problem. The Russians do stuff that you say are "war crimes", and what happens to them? Nothing. So why should anyone care if some person on the internet says these are war crimes? There's obviously no penalty against doing them, so they're not really war crimes.
- Planktonne 6mo agoNot being punished for something doesn't mean it isn't a crime, and doesn't mean it isn't wrong. Children have a more developed sense of ethics than that.
- dygd 6mo ago> So why should anyone care if some person on the internet says these are war crimes? Attacking civilian infrastructure is defined as a war crime by the Geneva Conventions. It's not something a person on the internet made up.
- shiroiuma 6mo agoThat's all nice and well, but what exactly is the point if it's not going to be enforced *at all*? So we can feel smug and superior?
- vharuck 6mo agoRemember that war crimes were defined to protect civilians. It's usually better for a civilian to be on the losing side in a war with no war crimes, than the winning side of a war with many war crimes.
- FpUser 6mo ago>"That's dual use infrastructure. " Especially desalination plants (your sunshine promised to bomb those as well).