3 ms·
I suspect there's less thought put into it than that. There's probably a firewall vendor that has a product that does SNI inspection for blocking things like p
by gpm 7mo ago
I suspect there's less thought put into it than that.
There's probably a firewall vendor that has a product that does SNI inspection for blocking things like pornhub and the product comes with a list of sites that includes VPN control planes.
- devilbunny 7mo agoWell, yeah, they didn't roll their own. Offhand, I forget the product, but it's definitely off the shelf. My point being that surely some of them have noticed the same thing I have, and it hasn't been stopped. I'm not going to raise the issue either way.
- dylan604 7mo ago> I'm not going to raise the issue either way. Except, you kinda just did
- devilbunny 7mo agoNot to them, in a way they can’t just ignore. I could be anyone here on HN.
- dylan604 7mo agoThat's why I said kinda. It'd be funny if someone working there was a visitor here...and it doesn't matter who you are. I was thinking of them closing the loophole
- devilbunny 7mo agoI understand your point better now, but if that was really a risk I cared about, I wouldn’t have put it on the public Internet to begin with. The worst they can do to me is make me tether, and my iPad will never hit that allotment. And, like I said, I think they use it themselves. So, no incentive to close their loophole.