4 ms·
Magnus Carlsen is still absolutely destroying anyone else in his 30s. By far. He didn't compete for the world champion becaue he didn't want to put in the effo
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Magnus Carlsen is still absolutely destroying anyone else in his 30s. By far.
He didn't compete for the world champion becaue he didn't want to put in the effort for the preparation (again). Also it would have been boring if he played it because he would have won again.
He intentionally starts with subobtimal openings at major turnaments because of boredom and still wins.
- Imustaskforhelp 6mo agoYes, magnus carlsen is a legendary player/the best player right now, there isn't much denying about it. Regarding boredom, I think that either it was magnus or hikaru who are/were really optimistic about chess960 (randomized chess essentially) because they have less value to openings and more values to the more live-ness of the situation so it has some exciting element to it. At a certain point for magnus, there really is only enough excitement within classical chess if you are the best players in the world. But he seems excited about chess960 (Edit: you have accidentally made me wonder but would hackernews like a chess club of our community [preferably within lichess]?) https://lichess.org/team/hackernews-chess-club https://lichess.org/team/hackernews-chess-club (The password is dang) :] Edit2: Interestingly, there is already a hackernews-chess-club after searching back on hackernews, https://lichess.org/team/hacker-news https://lichess.org/team/hacker-news, but they had the idea 6 years ago interesting :)
- lelanthran 6mo agoI sent you a challenge just now :-)
- mna_ 6mo agoFor the most part, he plays normal openings. If he does play something offbeat, it's because he's trying to avoid prep.
- somenameforme 6mo agoMagnus played 5 world chess championships. 2 games he played against the previous generation of players who were already well on their way out, and did phenomenally well. 1 game he played against Nepo in a completely even match until Nepo lost one game and went on his somewhat infamous monkey tilt. The other 2 games were against players of his generation. In the 24 games of those matches he ended up with a score of +1 =22 -1. And he was never the one pressing in the classical matches. Carlsen's paradoxical because he's undoubtedly the strongest player in contemporary times, if not in the entire history of chess, but his world championship matches have never been particularly impressive. And he thinks that his ability peaked sometime shortly before his match with Nepo. So he probably thinks there's a fairly good chance of him losing if he played another world championship match. On top of these observations, the one player he was willing to play a world championship match against was Alireza Firouzja. Alireza has an extremely poor record against Magnus, especially in slower time controls, had no experience in the pressures of a world championship match, and Magnus would have been an absurdly huge favorite against him. In other words, he's not playing a world championship matches because there's a reasonably good chance he spends months of work and effort preparing for it, only to ultimately lose and put that mark on his legacy. Right now it's still perfectly reasonable to call him the GOAT, but if he lost to somebody in a WCC match, that'd now always come with an asterisk.
- mellosouls 6mo agoTrue, though he was at his peak in his 20s. "My favorite player from the past is probably myself, 3-4 years ago.", Magnus Carlsen, 2018.