3 ms·
An E2EE system (e.g. as offered by Apple iCloud). Or a terms of service guarantee. (e.g. Dropbox, Anthropic and 1000 other companies that partition sharable use
by Nevermark 7mo ago
An E2EE system (e.g. as offered by Apple iCloud). Or a terms of service guarantee. (e.g. Dropbox, Anthropic and 1000 other companies that partition sharable user content from non-support divisions.)
> Would the button disable them from checking in and updating their profile?
No.
- raw_anon_1111 7mo agoWhen you post a check in, your relationship status, your pictures without setting your sharing preferences and update your profile - you are specifically doing with the intention to share. WhatsApp is E2E encrypted
- Nevermark 7mo agoI already gave you a storage/share E2EE example. I suggest that when things keep going over your head, like they did here, just Google the topic. And when people are kind enough to reply to your confusion, read with a little more care.
- raw_anon_1111 7mo agoI am not confused at all. You’re arguing that people care about their privacy when they are explicitly sharing private information above what is needed to participate in FB. You are completely wrong and your argument is illogical. People may not know that FB is making a profile of you based on your behavior. But logically, if I add to my profile that my favorite site is “grandma-midget-porn.com” [1], that I care that people don’t know I like senior citizen midgets [1] Please don’t let that be a real website.
- Nevermark 7mo agoPlease reread what i wrote from the start more carefully. I am not claiming what percentage of people care or not. I made a valid point of what is evidence or not, for not caring. You also responded to my E2EE reference without absorbing the example. It isn’t a big deal. We can move on.
- raw_anon_1111 6mo agoBecause it is irrelevant to whether people are purposefully explicitly sharing their likes and dislikes, and other information to let FB know more about them.
- Nevermark 6mo agoOf course. Nobody disputes whether.