4 ms·
It’s biaised to show this without the dates at which features were introduced. A lot of the downtimes in the breakdown are GitHub Actions, which launched in Aug
by hk__2 7mo ago
It’s biaised to show this without the dates at which features were introduced. A lot of the downtimes in the breakdown are GitHub Actions, which launched in August 2019; so yeah what a surprise there was no Actions downtime before because Actions didn’t exist.
- voxic11 7mo agoCheck the breakdown page. Like yes the magnitude is reduced obviously for individual services. But they all show the same trend.
- hk__2 7mo agoI checked the breakdown page, as I wrote: > A lot of the downtimes in the breakdown are GitHub Actions
- cuu508 7mo agoYou can click on "Breakdown" and then on "Actions" to hide it.
- mbauman 7mo agoEven worse, those features show "100% uptime" pre-existence on the breakdowns page too.
- siruwastaken 7mo agoThis is the real questionable part of the graphic. It seems that no-data pre 2018 was just considered 100% uptime (which is hardly historically accurate).
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]