2 ms·
Shockingly, still better than baltimore: https://foxbaltimore.com/news/city-in-crisis/baltimores-website-project-ends-with-no-website-taxpayer-funds-wasted http
by irishcoffee 7mo ago
Shockingly, still better than baltimore: https://foxbaltimore.com/news/city-in-crisis/baltimores-website-project-ends-with-no-website-taxpayer-funds-wasted https://foxbaltimore.com/news/city-in-crisis/baltimores-webs...
I think its cost over $5mm at this point, and the website doesn't exist. Oh, the company that built the site is owned by, I think the spouse of a council member, or something of that ilk.
Edit: 2.2mm, initial bid of 300k.