3 ms·
>it requires creating logical qubits with error rates that we are only now seeing companies report And yet 21 was not factored on a real hardware. >There is l
by newpavlov 6mo ago
>it requires creating logical qubits with error rates that we are only now seeing companies report
And yet 21 was not factored on a real hardware.
>There is linear engineering progress for getting from 32 bits to 256 bits being factored is my claim.
IMO it's a very bold claim until linear progress is demonstrated between 8, 16, and 32 bits. Not in theoretical papers. On a real hardware. With honest experiments using arbitrary integers.
It's easy to claim "QC will repeat Moore's law!" especially when your salary depends on it, but the practical evidence is quite lacking at the moment.
- spr-alex 6mo agoSo once again since I think I am not explaining it well, it might take a long time to go from factoring 21 to 35, and a long time from 35 to anything bigger, but from that point on the engineering has scaled up to the point that progress is very sudden. So if the canary in the coal mine is a 32-bit integer being factored, then the runway for deploying fixes is terminally short for defenders
- pseudohadamard 6mo agoAnd yet 21 was not factored on a real hardware. Yes it was, they used a VIC-20. Also an abacus. Not to mention a barking dog. https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237 https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237