3 ms·
Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose for as long as I can remember. This is nothing new.
by SoftTalker 7mo ago
Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose for as long as I can remember. This is nothing new.
- naikrovek 7mo agoshow me any that have claimed that they were for entertainment purposes only. sql server has never had that in its EULA. The GPL does not say that the software is for entertainment purposes only.
- chrisjj 7mo ago> Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose This is not such a disclaimer. If Copilot fails its purpose of entertaining you, you can sue. /i
- wat10000 7mo agoProhibiting the user from using it for any commercial or business purposes is definitely new!
- klez 7mo agoHave you really never seen any software saying "for non-commercial use only"?
- flawi 7mo agoWhen I'm paying for said software? No, I don't think I have.
- zombot 7mo agoThe Home/Personal edition of Mathematica is for non-commercial use only although it's a paid subscription. The world around you is not bound by your ignorance.
- wat10000 7mo agoDoes Wolfram advertise that edition of Mathematica as being "for work" like MS does the individual Copilot plan?
- wat10000 7mo agoOnly when it's a free/cheap consumer version of something with a pricey business version.
- zombot 7mo agoNo, it's not.
- mcmcmc 7mo agoWill be interesting to see if those still hold any weight (in the US at least) after the latest Meta rulings established defective design as a valid reason to sue big tech for damages
- dylan604 7mo agoThat's not not set yet though. It hasn't made it to appeals yet.
- jrecyclebin 7mo agoWell, except that, in this case, Copilot really is for entertainment purposes only.
- phyzome 7mo agoThat's not what this is, though.