3 ms·
> a rudderless leech for nearly 30 years now. Yeah, from small interactions over the past two decades, I have no idea how they could have been so bad while em
by NitpickLawyer 7mo ago
> a rudderless leech for nearly 30 years now.
Yeah, from small interactions over the past two decades, I have no idea how they could have been so bad while employing so many people. What on earth were those 30k people doing?! Their solutions were crap for ages.
- colechristensen 7mo ago>I have no idea how they could have been so bad while employing so many people There is a significant correlation between how many people you employ and how much nothing you accomplish. It means you've gotten big enough to survive long bouts of doing something and achieving nothing with large amounts of people.
- VirusNewbie 7mo agoAmazon empoloys 300k corporate employees. Apple has 170k. How is this a significant correlation. It seems there's literally no correlation between people and what is accomplished.
- rbanffy 7mo ago> What on earth were those 30k people doing?! Could be lawyers. Would we be sad if they were lawyers?
- dajt 7mo agoWe would not be sad if they were lawyers. But I'm sure they were not lawyers. Lawyers are how Oracle generates revenue. Developers & QA are cost centres and liabilties.
- Tuna-Fish 7mo agoThe Oracle codebase is legendarily gnarly. Doing even small things takes forever and a mountain of work.