4 ms·
Not stupid, but I think it's fair to say "careless about/unaware of the wider impact of their work".
by Planktonne 7mo ago
Not stupid, but I think it's fair to say "careless about/unaware of the wider impact of their work".
- eru 7mo agoWhat do you mean by wider impact? Model collapse would be the opposite of a wider impact: it's an immediate impact, and I'm fairly sure the people training these models have good incentives to avoid that. Eg by filtering data, by procuring better data, by applying techniques for making do with more limited data (we used to have a lot of those, and they are still known), or you can also adapt your training process to be less vulnerable to model collapse. Just because some researchers have shown that this happened for the models they tested, doesn't mean it has to be a universal thing.