3 ms·
I agree that's bad at any rate. However, I genuinely think that reading and learning without literal reproduction is not (should not be) a violation of copyrigh
by FeepingCreature 6mo ago
I agree that's bad at any rate. However, I genuinely think that reading and learning without literal reproduction is not (should not be) a violation of copyright and does not (should not) require an additional grant for content that has been made publicly available. I think that regardless of whether a company is the subject or the actor.
- FromTheFirstIn 6mo agoBut you’d usually have to pay for access to this copyrighted material, whether you reproduce it or not.
- FeepingCreature 6mo agoYep, and Anthropic lost that case correctly. I just don't think that "you have to buy one copy" will fix anything related to AI to the satisfaction of anybody but the law.