4 ms·
I for my part have not migrated to GIT cause i do not need the extra hoops like staging area or syncing whole repos over network. I have always a server at my s
by Surac 6mo ago
I for my part have not migrated to GIT cause i do not need the extra hoops like staging area or syncing whole repos over network. I have always a server at my side and can work with checkout/checkin. This implies a hard requirement at interface definitions, cause people can't just alter them. Seeing people struggle with all the problems introduced with the git way of work I feel there is still a big market for not git. People are introduced to git and stop asking if there isn't something more good to there workfow. Excuse my english please, im a non native speaker
- ramon156 6mo agoAt least jj tries to fix this partly, and I feel like its good enough for what I do. Most of my projects nowadays are solo, so I can keep it simple.
- nolist_policy 6mo agoGit is a decentralized version control system. Creating a new project is just a `git init` away. Of course centralized VCS are less popular. You need to setup a server first then wrangle with the server every time you create a new project -> fewer projects -> fewer users.