3 ms·
It's was a rhetorical question, he doesn't own it. And it takes much less than sixty seconds to figure that out: $ whois 2602:fed2:7e02:: ... NetRange:
by jcalvinowens 7mo ago
It's was a rhetorical question, he doesn't own it. And it takes much less than sixty seconds to figure that out:
$ whois 2602:fed2:7e02::
...
NetRange: 2602:FED2:: - 2602:FED2:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF
CIDR: 2602:FED2::/32
NetName: 10VPN-PRIMARY
NetHandle: NET6-2602-FED2-1
Parent: NET6-2600 (NET6-2600-1)
NetType: Direct Allocation
If that VPN provider goes out of business, he probably loses those addresses.
- simoncion 7mo agoYou must be aware that he owns the allocation in exactly the same way you "own" an ARIN allocation? Unless you have an exemption, there are fees that you must pay annually [0]. If you do not pay them, you relinquish your assignment. [1] There's another sense in which he owns the allocation... the one you constructed in your original question: Do you actually own that /48? The problem with using the globally routable addresses internally is that your public /48 might change in the future, and and that will force you to change a bunch of internal stuff. He's paying his money to get a statically assigned /48. It's not too surprising that you can't get this information out of a whois invocation. It is -however- a bit surprising that you weren't aware that whois couldn't tell you this. [0] <https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/#rsp-service-categories-and-fees https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/#rsp-servic...> [1] See section 4(c) of <https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/agreements/rsa.pdf https://www.arin.net/about/corporate/agreements/rsa.pdf>