3 ms·
> I’ve tried using it on a desktop before and rolling that back cleanly isn’t exactly straightforward. Well, sure, but Proxmox was never intended to be a deskt
by traceroute66 7mo ago
> I’ve tried using it on a desktop before and rolling that back cleanly isn’t exactly straightforward.
Well, sure, but Proxmox was never intended to be a desktop solution.
It was always intended as a server solution, installed on bare-metal, and therefore "rolling-back" is a re-format and re-install (or shredding the drives if the server is being decommissioned).
- arch1e 7mo agoThat’s fair, but that kind of reinforces my point. If the expected recovery path is “wipe and reinstall,” then it’s clearly not just a thin layer on top of Debian. It’s effectively its own platform with its own assumptions, lifecycle, and upgrade path. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it’s a very different model from something that can coexist with or cleanly detach from the base system. That distinction matters depending on how people want to use it, especially outside of a dedicated bare-metal server context. So yeah, Proxmox is built on Debian, but in practice it behaves more like a tightly integrated appliance than a simple UI sitting on top.
- no_time 7mo agoWell said, you get what I'm looking for. This might be the reason for me to give freebsd a go. Though my current hardware probably wouldn't play nice with it.