> The thing with dot-com was that there was actual public market corruption & euphoria. Just like now, the financial cup game is insane. Commiting money to a c

> The thing with dot-com was that there was actual public market corruption & euphoria. Just like now, the financial cup game is insane. Commiting money to a company that plans on doing a thing if they can get another company to do a thing and then that company is leveraging those cumulative possibilities in its own wager. The speculation is out of control.