3 ms·
How is conceptualizing what the model is doing as having a conversation any different from any other abstraction? “No, the browser isn’t downloading a file. The
by alehlopeh 6mo ago
How is conceptualizing what the model is doing as having a conversation any different from any other abstraction? “No, the browser isn’t downloading a file. The electrons in the silicon are actually…”
- colechristensen 6mo agoThere are people with a philosophical objection to using everyday words to describe LLM interactions for various reasons, but commonly because they're worried stupid people will confuse the LLM for a person. Which, I suppose stupid people will do that, but I'm not inventing a parallel language or putting a * next to each thing which means "this, but with an LLM instead of a person"
- cruffle_duffle 6mo agoThat is an interesting way of looking at that, thanks for the perspective! Like, the words fit… why create a second parallel language for describing LLM behavior. Somebody else said it… the whole “it’s a stochastic parrot” thing is sooooo cliche and boring at this point. It’s like, duh… what is your point?
- righthand 6mo agoOne is an abstraction, another is a fantasy.