3 ms·

You could subtract out the French market and Uber would still be profitable. Rebutting anti-tech arguments is hard because there's always another round of what

You could subtract out the French market and Uber would still be profitable. Rebutting anti-tech arguments is hard because there's always another round of whataboutism to move the goalposts a little further. My argument is that "tech is perfect and completely without fault". I was rebutting the arguments (more accurately, lack of a real argument) in this anti-tech blog post.

southerntofu 7mo ago
That blog post was definitely not anti-tech. Maybe you're not familiar with this term. The post was critical of technology from a social/political perspective (with arguments), as were the luddites, but that's not anti-tech. Anti-tech primitivists [1] exist, though a minority on the political spectrum. I don't agree with your argument, but it may be more convincing without making a strawman of the original blogpost. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism