4 ms·

cool idea, how far back (in time) do those 27k commits go? Just thinking how this could maybe used for (automated) research / visualization on the evolution of

• codethief 7mo ago
  > how far back (in time) do those 27k commits go Looking at the commit dates (which seem to be derived from the original publication dates) the history seems quite sparse/incomplete(?) I mean, there have only been 26 commits since 2000.
  • Meneth 7mo ago
    It seems the commits aren't in proper date order. Here are some newer changes, placed before the latest commits: https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es/commits/master/?after=1d6c96ca4d632e1660bf6dd9661f045eadd814e0+104 https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es/commits/master/?af...
    • forgotpwd16 7mo ago
      It's related to commits actually having a parent-child structure (forming a graph) and timestamps (commit/author) being metadata. So commits 1->2->3->4 could be modified to have timestamps 1->3->2->4. I know GitHub prefers sorting with author over commit date, but don't know how topology is handled.
      • codethief 7mo ago
        > It's related to commits actually having a parent-child structure (forming a graph) and timestamps (commit/author) being metadata. Yeah, I think everyone is aware. It's just that the last couple dozen commits, to me, looked like commits had been created in chronological order, so that topological order == chronological order. > I know GitHub prefers sorting with author over commit date, but don't know how topology is handled. Commits are usually sorted topologically.