5 ms·
For anyone who wants to do this, the data's available: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/nov/07/us-2012-election-county-results-download http://www.
by pronoiac 14y ago
For anyone who wants to do this, the data's available:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/nov/07/us-2012-election-county-results-download http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/nov/07/us-2012-...
- hammock 14y agoI'm going to do it right now!
- pserwylo 14y agoI stumbled upon the same dataset, so did the following map: http://i.imgur.com/8YjOg.png http://i.imgur.com/8YjOg.png Here is some notes: https://gist.github.com/4034954 https://gist.github.com/4034954 Edit: If anything, I'd say that the counties themselves are more divided than I thought. The one which surprises me the most is the deep south of texas, which is quite blue. Also, I do not claim that I did this flawlessly, there is a chance I stuffed up and it is not showing the right data, but I don't really have the time to play with it for too long :)
- mikeash 14y agoThe first thing I noticed on your map (which is really nice, by the way) was that it's far more divisive than the per-state version. Most interesting. I think this just highlights what people have been saying for quite a while now, that the political divide in this country isn't red states versus blue states, but urban versus rural. If you go to a level that separates those, as per-county does but per-state doesn't, you see a much bigger divide.
- jlarocco 14y agoSouth Texas results aren't too surprising. There's a huge Hispanic population down there.
- pserwylo 14y agoAh, of course. Thanks for pointing that out.