3 ms·
Screens on their own aren’t “uniquely and magically addictive”, but infinitely scrollable short form video delivered through that screen is, because a few compa
by maxaw 6mo ago
Screens on their own aren’t “uniquely and magically addictive”, but infinitely scrollable short form video delivered through that screen is, because a few companies spent billions on the smartest minds in the world to make it so.
- megaman821 6mo agoSo you would support banning any form of entertainment that people spend more time on than TikTok since it would be above the threshold of addiction?
- InvertedRhodium 6mo agoMore or less, yeah. There might be some nuance about the threshold for maladaptive behaviour, but if it’s all or nothing I’ll take all.
- twoodfin 6mo agoHow would you get around the First Amendment difficulties?
- bjt 6mo agoThere are plenty of public interest limitations on free speech. Food labels, cigarette warnings, deceptive ad laws. Regulating addictive social media isn't really an outlier here.
- twoodfin 6mo agoEven commercial speech regulations need a stronger basis than, “People spend a lot of time listening to it.”
- intended 6mo agoThe parent comment set up a false choice and then had to adapt to the response calling their bluff. The issue isn’t with reading or consuming content, as was set up in the challenge above. The issue is with designing feeds and surfacing content in ways that take advantage of our brains. As an analogy, loot boxes in video games, and slot machines come to mind. Both are designed to leverage behavioral psychology, and this design choice directly results in compulsive behavior amongst users.
- InvertedRhodium 6mo agoI live in New Zealand, so I don't have to.
- maxaw 6mo agoI didn’t mention time? From Cambridge dictionary: ‘addiction: an inability to stop doing or using something, especially something harmful.’ I am in support of regulating things which are harmful and which people have trouble not doing
- twoodfin 6mo agoLike potato chips?
- fc417fc802 6mo agoIf a specially designed endless bag of such were aggressively marketed and chemicals to induce appetite added to them then sure.
- twoodfin 6mo agoNone of those attributes are necessary beyond those of an ordinary bag of Lays to meet the definition: “things which are harmful and which people have trouble not doing”
- fc417fc802 6mo agoIt's a matter of degree. I don't impulsively drive to the store to purchase another bag immediately after finishing the one I have whereas (for example) many people exhibit such behavior when it comes to tobacco. In the case of social media the feed is intentionally designed to be difficult to walk away from and it is endless (or close enough as makes no practical difference). Even if it weren't endless, refreshing an ever changing page is trivial in comparison to driving to the store and spending money.
- twoodfin 6mo agoHow would you contrast social media with Netflix in this regard?