4 ms·
16MB still seems massive for this kind of app. I ran Visual Studio 4, not an app, but an entire app factory, on a 66MHz 486 with 16MB RAM. And it was snappy.
by elevation 7mo ago
16MB still seems massive for this kind of app. I ran Visual Studio 4, not an app, but an entire app factory, on a 66MHz 486 with 16MB RAM. And it was snappy. A TODO list app that uses system UI elements could be significantly smaller.
What do I gain if more developers take this approach? Lightning fast performance. Faster backups. Decreased battery drain => longer battery service lifetime => more time in between hardware refreshes. Improved security posture due to orders of magnitude less SLOC. Improved reliability from decreased complexity.
- fireant 7mo ago16MB is less than a display buffer for a 4k display. It is never ever going to happen again just due to hardware realities.
- phito 7mo agoLess RAM usage doesn't equal better performances or faster software. It actually might mean the opposite, if you're not caching things in RAM.
- account42 6mo agoIf a TODO list app has more than 16MB of data it could possibly cache in RAM then there is already something seriously wrong.