4 ms·
I would go further than that, and say I would happily pay £40 or so a month for unfettered access to tv, music, games, etc. They could take my money and divide
by Torn 14y ago
I would go further than that, and say I would happily pay £40 or so a month for unfettered access to tv, music, games, etc.
They could take my money and divide it between the content creators based on the content that I had consumed.
Let's get away from silo'd mentatlities reinforcing old-world ownership models, and make content easy-enough to consume without having to revert to piracy.
- jobu 14y agoApple was able to do this for music with iTunes, and now the video content owners are terrified of giving any one platform too much access and losing control of the market. By keeping the market fragmented they have more leverage over the platforms (Apple, Amazon, Netflix), and it they hope to gain more control (and money) over the long term. In the short term I think this actually hurts both the platform owners and the content providers because it's so much easier to download the content illegitimately right now.