3 ms·
> Genspect, which is also a biased source on the subject: Organization that supports position <x> supports position <x>. If Genspect can be discarded as being
by appreciatorBus 7mo ago
> Genspect, which is also a biased source on the subject:
Organization that supports position <x> supports position <x>.
If Genspect can be discarded as being a biased source, then so can WPATH and every other org supporting gender ideology.
Given the fraught nature of the debate, Wikipedia seems like a poor source for determining the bias of players in the debate - the most passionate debaters have plenty of time to just edit Wikipedia.
- Ralfp 7mo agoCan you explain what „gender ideology” is supposed to mean? The primary issue with Genspect is poor scientific rigour applied to their publications, as I have shown above. Pretty much „if it fits our platform, we will spread it”.
- appreciatorBus 7mo agoWPATH : if it fits our platform, we will spread it.