totally agree - shall be showing that demo soon - you are right — that’s a gap in how I’ve presented /formalized it so far. A more concrete way to describe the

totally agree - shall be showing that demo soon - you are right — that’s a gap in how I’ve presented /formalized it so far. A more concrete way to describe the problem: In many systems where independently developed components need to coordinate (e.g. services processing data or running in containers), the logic that determines when something should happen ends up being: spread across code implicit in assumptions hard to inspect or debug over time What I’m trying to explore here is a different approach: make the conditions for execution explicit in the message itself; So instead of: components calling each other or relying on shared workflow logic they react to explicit state carried in messages. I’m working on a small runnable example to show this more concretely — I think that will make the idea much clearer than the protocol description alone.