4 ms·
This explains it best: > When Facebook was born, it gave people who were already using MySpace a tool that would pretend to be you and log into MySpace, collec
by mentalgear 7mo ago
This explains it best:
> When Facebook was born, it gave people who were already using MySpace a tool that would pretend to be you and log into MySpace, collect all the messages that your friends had left for you, and put them in your Facebook inbox. You could reply to them there, and it would send them back to your MySpace outbox, so your friends would see them. And that was what allowed Facebook to take so many users from MySpace so quickly. This is what interoperability is about. But if you tried to do that today, Facebook would use laws that were either enforced differently or did not even exist at the time of MySpace, to ruin you.
> If we were to restore this “noble ancient art” of technological interoperability, the users who are so obviously discontent with the platforms they use would consider the costs low enough to leave and join better spaces. In turn, the companies would be smaller, would pay more attention to user satisfaction, and could not push around the governments that tried to hold them to account.
https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/cory-doctorow-how-to-take-back-the-internet/ https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/cory-doctorow-how-to-tak...
- bitwize 7mo agoB-but... muh unicorn-like growth...!
- julianlam 7mo agoDoctorow recently spoke (remotely) at FediMTL in Montreal. He laid out the stakes as usual, but added that in Canada, we are legally not allowed to reverse engineer competitor APIs, and we gave up this right as part of some free trade negotiation.
- xorcist 7mo ago"Free trade" is one of those euphemisms that seldom is free and only sometimes concerns trade. It's mostly about leverage to create a stronger position for negotiations.