> I didn't say everyone. > So, you think someone that illegally drives drunk will magically decide to abstain from driving because they don't have a license?

> I didn't say everyone. > So, you think someone that illegally drives drunk will magically decide to abstain from driving because they don't have a license? You have to prove that everyone will do it, because if not, than someone will, disproving your belief. Because if you can't prove everyone, you've proven that there are people who would not drive without a driver's license. > This isn't a good-faith conversation. No, you're a liar. > That isn't what I said, Yes. > I said someone who _already broke the law_ in a very provable way, most likely doesn't give a fuck about driving without a license. That was what I meant. I'm sorry that context is difficult for you, but yes, that's what I meant when I said what I said.