3 ms·
The argument is that the opportunity cost outweighs the marginal gains. The original argument (it's linked is that): * The major manufacturers are already res
by icegreentea2 7mo ago
The argument is that the opportunity cost outweighs the marginal gains.
The original argument (it's linked is that):
* The major manufacturers are already restricting asbestos
* That asbestos contamination is detrimental to cosmetic quality, and therefore manufacturers have a self-interested motivation to meet their claimed safety specifications
* In any case, the most likely sources of contamination are those which were not yet determined to be cancer causing
* Oh, and we should regulate medicinal talc first before cosmetics