> An example closer to home is those file sharing sites that allow you to pay to "download faster" which skirt very close to the line, if not go over it. I kno

> An example closer to home is those file sharing sites that allow you to pay to "download faster" which skirt very close to the line, if not go over it. I know some file sharing sites do ip logging so if DMCA strikes happen, they can simply ban the ip too. Is there anything tangetially important to these file sharing sites too after this decision by Supreme Court? I can imagine that as long as they operate legal things as well and dont do things under the intention of just being used for piracy (from their sides but we all know the reality) Then, they don't have to do anything other than just accepting the DMCA notice. There are definitely server providers who are more privacy oriented while being affordable who only get involved not even with DMCA but rather some court ruling within their specific country which can be permissive. So is it possible for now for a file sharing provider to say that we follow the DMCA but only if you can get it written from a local judge that we will remove these files for the purposes of Privacy for our end users?