4 ms·
>If you're not going to bother putting in any effort into the debate, please don't participate at all. you are "debating" against a fictional argument. no one
by john_strinlai 7mo ago
>If you're not going to bother putting in any effort into the debate, please don't participate at all.
you are "debating" against a fictional argument. no one is saying that it is okay to steal or "remove by force" someones pet.
they presented you with several citations about how damaging house cats are (and there are several more, you can start at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_predation_on_wildlife https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_predation_on_wildlife) and you said... "nu uh".
>I'm looking after for my cat's wellbeing, not some bird's
wildly selfish statement.
- sillysaurusx 7mo agoOnce again: You kill flies. Sometimes dozens of them. Your conscience is clear. That's wildly selfish of you, yet you don't seem to care about the flies. Why not? They're just as much a part of the ecosystem as the birds. Also, this entire discussion is off-topic. The point was for vets to verify microchips, something directly related to the article.
- john_strinlai 7mo agoyou literally just quoted something about "respond to the central argument" to me. instead of following your own advice, you are closing your eyes, saying "off-topic" and yelling "what about!". all the while, ignoring the entire argument being put forth (alongside the dozens of citations that back the argument up). i feel bad for your neighbors.