3 ms·
Local LLM options for less technical people is worth celebrating IMO. No, not "anybody" can have one-shotted this in CC in an hour. We have not seen a tidal wa
by kylehotchkiss 7mo ago
Local LLM options for less technical people is worth celebrating IMO. No, not "anybody" can have one-shotted this in CC in an hour.
We have not seen a tidal wave of untechnical people vibe coding up their own software solutions.
- nozzlegear 7mo agoedit: nevermind I misread a word and made a social faux pas I do agree that more local LLM options are always better.
- Barbing 7mo ago>not
- nozzlegear 7mo agoOpe
- Barbing 7mo agonaux pas :)
- collabs 7mo agoTo add to this, the value that ente or someone like that can bring to the table here is a firm pledge to improve it and maintain it going forward. That to me is more valuable than code vibe coded by Claude in one afternoon.
- jermaustin1 7mo ago> We have not seen a tidal wave of untechnical people vibe coding up their own software solutions. When my little brother who is a drummer, and has never even looked at "code" before, had claude on-shot a python app that let him download songs on youtube, extract the stems, collect tempo/key/etc information, then feed that into his DAW, all without ever looking at code, knowing what any of it did, etc., I knew that we were about to see a LOT of single-use applications. I'm not against it, honestly. I have always written little one-off scripts and apps that accomplished something faster than manually, now that those one-shots are possible with an LLM in seconds sometimes, it makes all my personal scripts so much easier... that said, I definitely read the scripts that are output, and attempt to step through them in a debugger before assuming it is all good.