3 ms·
If you mean MITM between DNS Server and CA (e.g. letsencrypt), thats on a level of BGP hacking (means for me government involved) and means they can just use a
by 0x073 6mo ago
If you mean MITM between DNS Server and CA (e.g. letsencrypt), thats on a level of BGP hacking (means for me government involved) and means they can just use a CA (e.g. Fina CA 2025 with cloudflare).
I think the risk didn't change much (except for big corp/bank).
- throw0101d 6mo agoAt one point (pre-HTTPS ubiquity) the NSA hacked (e.g.) Belgium telecoms via injecting malware into web response from (e.g.) Slashdot: * https://thehackernews.com/2013/11/snowden-reveals-gchq-planted-malware.html https://thehackernews.com/2013/11/snowden-reveals-gchq-plant... * https://www.aclu.org/documents/quantum-insert-diagrams https://www.aclu.org/documents/quantum-insert-diagrams * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-on-the-side_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-on-the-side_attack Still state-level, but probably less noticeable than BGP hijacking. Unless you're entering IP addresses in all your applications and code, non-SEC DNS is an unsecured link in the chain of communications.