4 ms·
> there are better heuristics to use and using old ones means you’re operating on old software You’re making a lot of pronouncements that are arbitrary to you
by beedeebeedee 7mo ago
> there are better heuristics to use and using old ones means you’re operating on old software
You’re making a lot of pronouncements that are arbitrary to you
- AndrewKemendo 7mo agoIt’s a rare condition called having an educated and informed opinion
- beedeebeedee 6mo agoI don’t want to punch down, but that comes across a lot like trump saying he has the biggest words. You may not have the time or inclination, but there is a lot to learn from studying Hegel and the history of philosophy. No ‘measurement’ is required.
- AndrewKemendo 6mo agoThat was never a question. There are structural limits to the Hegelian Dialectic being used as a universal epistemology Marxism and other non-numerically based epistemology traditions refuse to accept this The majority of people aren’t even as deep as hegel and yet even the hegelians still think they have a universal epistemology when they have a keplerian version at best that hasn’t even heard of subatomic particles
- beedeebeedee 6mo ago> That was never a question You originally made the statement that "Hegel is irrelevant in the age of measurement", to which I objected. Unless you're going to back pedal further, you did find studying Hegel questionable. I'm not going to go on the attack, but your pronouncements and self-certainty do not sound well considered.
- AndrewKemendo 6mo agoThey can both be true For an ignorant uneducated person with absolutely no education thinking dialectically is an improvement If you are a doctor or prime minister in 2026 you’re neglegent if your epistemological roots are based on a hegelian dialectic But go off queen
- beedeebeedee 6mo agoTop-notch philosophical argumentation. All of your rare, educated and informed opinions really shine.