3 ms·
I heard children loved the rock... Now go to IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12042730/reviews/?rating=1&ref_=tt_ururv_histo_1 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt
by inaros 7mo ago
I heard children loved the rock...
Now go to IMDB:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12042730/reviews/?rating=1&ref_=tt_ururv_histo_1 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12042730/reviews/?rating=1&ref_...
sort by worst review and you will see the comments and reviews make a lot of sense...If you believe like some of commentators this is a 10/10 movie, you also probably believe these reviews are not manipulated...
- ceejayoz 7mo ago> sort by worst review This is about the worst methodology you could possibly use here. > If you believe like some of commentators this is a 10/10 movie, you also probably believe these reviews are not manipulated… 100% of online reviews should be treated as manipulated.
- inaros 7mo ago>> This is about the worst methodology you could possibly use here. By the contrary. It is the absolutely best methodology. I am surprised you cant see why. You should do the same for hotel reviews or amazon products. Its about the CONTENT and nature of the bad review. The best way to judge a movie, hotel, or product is often to read the negative reviews first, because negative reviews reveal the failure modes. A positive review just usually tells you what worked for someone. A negative review tells you what can go wrong, and whether that problem matters to you. You should always start with the worst reviews because they reveal the real weaknesses. Then you judge whether the criticism comes from an unreasonable person or from somebody thoughtful and fair. If the negative reviewer is intelligent, specific, and or balanced, that review is often more valuable than ten positive ones, because it shows the actual risks and not just the hype. Use it for movies, books, hotels and amazon products...
- ceejayoz 7mo ago> A negative review tells you what can go wrong, and whether that problem matters to you. You accidentally made my point here. "Whether that problem matters to you" is a matter of opinion. You apparently find the smattering of negative reviews to match your opinion; that's fine! But they don't match mine, or everyone's. Opinion-wise, the movie seems to be doing just fine. This weekend we'll get the actual metric that tends to matter, the % drop-off after the first week. That tends to be a pretty good indicator of actual public opinion and word of mouth. (And frankly, at this point, I tend to assume the negative reviews on Amazon are competitors review bombing. They're no more immune than the positive ones.)
- inaros 7mo ago[dead]
- joe5150 7mo agoA movie which doesn't satisfy your specific tastes and expectations in science fiction hasn't "failed".
- inaros 7mo agoAgain...dont confuse taste and quality: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519704 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519704
- joe5150 7mo agoThis is pure sophistry. Your complaints about the movie's tone and dialogue are strictly and specifically problems of your own taste, not filmmaking quality. The movie is (objectively!) well made with respect to "craft, skill, storytelling structure and emotional impact".
- throw0101d 7mo ago> sort by worst review Now go to IMDb again: * https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12042730/ratings/?ref_=tt_ov_rat https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12042730/ratings/?ref_=tt_ov_ra... and look at the score distribution.
- inaros 7mo agoThat is the kind of metric that got Trump elected....
- throw0101d 7mo ago“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” — H.L. Mencken
- inaros 7mo agoDont disagree :-)