3 ms·
If they didn't cite your paper that's bullshit. But if they read your paper enough that they invited you to a talk, that probably means they were far enough al
by jmalicki 7mo ago
If they didn't cite your paper that's bullshit.
But if they read your paper enough that they invited you to a talk, that probably means they were far enough along to independently inventing it they were going to do so anyway, and wanted to chat with someone who was also doing the thing they were already doing. Good ideas tend to reveal themselves to anyone who is aware of the problem.
- ekjhgkejhgk 7mo agoDoesn't matter, you should still cite. It's basic manners in science.
- kleiba 7mo agoExactly, that's why the section is called "Related Work".
- cubefox 7mo ago> But if they read your paper enough that they invited you to a talk, that probably means they were far enough along to independently inventing it That's more than a stretch. They likely invited them because someone thought the abstract sounded interesting, or something like that.
- efavdb 7mo agoThe earlier paper was from 2021!
- amitport 7mo agoTo be clear, I am not claiming they stole an idea. They have made significant independent research. However, a specific part regarding the treatment of rotation with bias correction relates to prior work, and it would be appropriate to have that recognized.
- jmalicki 7mo agoIf they didn't at least cite it, it is complete bullshit. If they cited it, but you feel you deserved more credit than that... I feel you, but it's less clear cut.
- CyberDildonics 7mo agoThat's rationalizing like crazy. If they knew about it they should have cited it.
- jmalicki 7mo agoThat's what I'm saying - not citing is total bullshit. But if they invited a talk, and published a paper and cited it, it might be a little off, but not horrible.