4 ms·
*The "monopoly" aspect isn't really relevant here. It's not If you're infringing it's because you're copying the design. Well that audacious. I'm will be less
by ynniv 14y ago
*The "monopoly" aspect isn't really relevant here. It's not If you're infringing it's because you're copying the design.
Well that audacious. I'm will be less daring and say that with 500 patents, you are most certainly wrong about some of them.
Last time I said this, you brought up a 60 year old RF parent, but I'll give you another shot and say that I hav never seen a software patent worth protecting.
- rayiner 14y agoThe RF patent was an example of the kind of patent I worked with, not a software patent specifically. My example for a software patent would be the h.264 patent. That's not something a practitioner of ordinary skill would find obvious.