3 ms·
I mean how else could it be? Some app for Grampa? Junior? The scope of complexity of these problems (which build on tech the viber need not make) is small. Ther
by scrubs 7mo ago
I mean how else could it be? Some app for Grampa? Junior? The scope of complexity of these problems (which build on tech the viber need not make) is small. There's no serious support dimension or risk.
The last step matters. When I'm talking about "apps" as a professional software engineer, I'm thinking about postgres, big table, ramcloud, dpdk, and applications in finance like a security master or system of record. Those apps have actual customers that for the money they pay demand something in product quality Claude can't do.
You write "products on the market are not solutions to problems." This speaks volumes and not to the good. You then add "tools to make money" which I read as "side hustle." It's has all the salience and import of a disposable tissue ... what you'd expect people to see that as? Bold leadership? C'mon, get real.
- TeMPOraL 7mo ago> You write "products on the market are not solutions to problems." This speaks volumes and not to the good. You then add "tools to make money" which I read as "side hustle." It's has all the salience and import of a disposable tissue ... what you'd expect people to see that as? Bold leadership? C'mon, get real. What I mean is, turning a solution into a product is an explicit step, and that step is not about solving the problem, but about getting paid. This is not a value judgement, merely clarification - one needed especially here, where people get confused by entrepreneurship advice and sometimes forget that they can just solve their own problems and move on. Not every solution needs to be productized, and there's no law of nature or man that says it must be.
- scrubs 7mo agoWhat you write is for the service provider, not for customers. I'm interested in customers. I'm interested in business, which has a support and risk dimension. Nuff said