4 ms·

Those were deterministic rather than stochastic

• deleted 7mo ago
  [deleted]
• bigstrat2003 7mo ago
  Exactly. People love to compare LLMs to power tools for carpenters and smiths. But if my miter saw had a 20% chance to produce cuts at a 45 degree angle when I have it set for 90, I would throw it out so fast I would leave Looney Tunes style tracks. A tool which only sometimes does its job is worse than no tool at all.
  • vablings 7mo ago
    To be rather pedantic your miter saw probably doesn't cut exactly 90 degrees. Especially if you reset it. LLMS are low accuracy for sure but so are humans. I am not saying AI is going to replace us all in a whole entirety my broader point is that these tools will be another tool that changes the market share of jobs.
    • kerblang 7mo ago
      The low accuracy of human guesstimation is why we use deterministic tools, not so-called tools that imitate our ability (or worse). Tools are not replacements for people! Tools are enhancements. AI is an attempt to replace people with something unhuman.