Can you share some actual evidence for your case? I really don't believe it. The anti-RCV story about Alaska 2022 holds that Palin spoiled round 1 of the instan

Can you share some actual evidence for your case? I really don't believe it. The anti-RCV story about Alaska 2022 holds that Palin spoiled round 1 of the instant runoff by splitting the vote with Begich, causing Begich to drop out. RCV only beats vote-for-one, unless you can make a convincing case otherwise. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04764v3 https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04764v3 (Yes, I agree with the conclusion of this paper, but I argue that we can do better with Approval or STAR.) Basic modelling on a 2D political compass gives a Yee diagram, demonstrating RCV's counterintuitive results. Yeah, that's theory, but Alaska 2022 demonstrates a real case of it. And the list of center-squeeze cases on the Wikipedia page, too. http://zesty.ca/voting/sim http://zesty.ca/voting/sim https://electowiki.org/wiki/Yee_diagram https://electowiki.org/wiki/Yee_diagram > That's a core and long-proven theorem in social choice theory. Do you mean Arrow's theorem? Doesn't apply to STAR or Approval. > The idea that approval voting, STAR voting, or Condorcet voting is superior to RCV for this reason is a misconception based on decades-old research that is no longer current. Share the research, please! Here's some recent research, obviously biased for STAR and against RCV. https://www.equal.vote/peer_review https://www.equal.vote/peer_review