Matt is quite wrong on this one. It's like going to a train station, and there are 300 free but slow trains, and 1 slightly faster train where you have to pay m

Matt is quite wrong on this one. It's like going to a train station, and there are 300 free but slow trains, and 1 slightly faster train where you have to pay money. Only a very few people will pay to use the fast train, and it will soon go out of business. The newspaper business is going to have to become free. There is no other alternative. Writers are what are valuable, people with insight, and not the name or brand of the paper. Those people will survive, but the aggregator of their information, has to be free.