2 ms·
Agreed. Not knowing the author is all the more better as the response will be not clouded by "OMG, he created Erlang :)"
by ananthrk 18y ago
Agreed. Not knowing the author is all the more better as the response will be not clouded by "OMG, he created Erlang :)"
- jmtulloss 18y agoAt the same time, Erlang handles its problem domain like a champ. Knowing that this was written by Joe Armstrong, you can see that he might be approaching this from a different angle than others, even if he is lacking in eloquence here. I would tend to agree that OO is pretty bad for highly parallel programs, which makes this all seem a bit more reasonable.