4 ms·
Read some real news
by ericfr11 6mo ago
Read some real news
- carlosjobim 6mo agoRead official decisions from the defence forces of Finland and/or Sweden. Huge offshore wind projects have been stopped recently. Or be a reality denying hacker if you prefer.
- brookst 6mo agoI can’t make heads or tails of your point. Are you saying that because Sweden has to worry about Russia invading from the east, the US shouldn’t build any wind farms anywhere? That can’t be right. What do you really mean?
- carlosjobim 6mo agoThey don't want another surprise attack from the sea like pearl harbor.
- tempestn 6mo agoYou're saying offshore wind farms would prevent the US from detecting an intercontinental attack crossing the ocean?
- hedora 6mo agoPh'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%27lyeh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%27lyeh
- carlosjobim 6mo agoFrom where else would an enemy be able to attack? There's two options: ocean or space.
- brookst 6mo agoAnd you think a Pearl Harbor sized attack force could cross oceans undetected and hide behind wind farms? Please tell me you’re just yanking our chains and don’t really believe that?
- carlosjobim 6mo agoMuch larger attack forces are currently cruising the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and have been doing so for decades. The oceans are international waters, giant voids where it's hard to know where your enemy is. They can be a thousand miles away from your coast and launch cruise missiles with more fire power than that of Pearl Harbour. If there is a radar/signal disturbance on your coast which can help them, they will take advantage of it.
- KennyBlanken 6mo agoWe're not the ones arguing the absurd position that the concerns two small countries with extreme closeness to Russia (and a history of prior invasions) more than a thousand miles away, with completely different geography, apply to a vastly different country in a completely different area of the world.
- carlosjobim 6mo ago[flagged]